TechnicalJones.com

Author

Leroy Jones, Jr. is the creator of Talking Technology with Leroy Jones, Jr.

Recently in Technology Category

mHealth & Tumors

| No Comments

Image result for Oncology

A interesting, and important development for 
those who know this both this battle & journey!

Check out:


"mHealth also could provide an opportunity for a new type of communication. The traditional periodic patient visit has the potential to be combined with more frequent, continuous digital communication for more effective care."

(via @TargetedOnc)

mHealth: Hemophiliacs & Cellphones

| No Comments

Tech Jones_June 2017.jpg

The continued uses of mHealth create gives those with chronic or live threatening illnesses greater possibilities!

Check this out:


"Cellphones are a good way for hemophiliacs receiving care at home to relay information that doctors need to stay on top of their treatment. But a lot of patients have yet to embrace the service -- and a recent online survey of 181 hemophiliacs shed some light on why."


What is Digital Health?

| No Comments

Tech Jone_June 2017.jpg

What is Digital Health?

Check out this article to find out more:


"One of the most far-reaching trends in the healthcare industry right now is digital health. What is digital health? It is a broad array of technologies including mobile health (mHealth), health information technology (IT), wearable devices, telehealth and telemedicine services, and personalized medicine."

(via @themotleyfool)


Moving Forward with Rural Broadband

| No Comments


Recently, the website The Conversation, which bills itself as a forum for academic analysis, posted a fascinating article on the implications of America's changing demographics. 


Authored by two Penn State professors whose research was funded by the NIH, the article begins by noting that, "Racial and ethnic diversity is no longer confined to big cities and the east and west coasts of the United States."

 

Specifically, the authors show how this trend toward greater diversity "is not limited to urban America. Dramatic increases are evident in rural places as well." Ninety percent of rural areas in the U.S. became more diverse between 1990 and 2010, they write.

 

The points raised in their article are particularly timely given the FCC's recent vote to promote rural broadband. As demographic profiles of small towns and communities continue changing, these communities' needs change too.  This makes their need for broadband access and connection speeds comparable to urban areas especially important.

 

Thankfully, it looks like Washington understands this. Last week, the FCC unanimously approved launching the second phase of its Mobility Fund, which funds expanding wireless voice and broadband services in underserved areas. The FCC also approved the next step in its Connect America Fund auction, which supports voice and broadband service deployment in under-served high-cost areas. 

 

The Mobility Fund order provides up to $4.53 billion during the next decade ($453 million per year for ten years) to expand 4G LTE coverage to areas that lack this service. The service will have at least a median speed of ten megabits per second (Mbps), which is enough to stream HD movies.

 

Interestingly, rather than using grants, the FCC chose to distribute these funds through a "reverse auction" system.  The plan is to have wireless companies compete against each other by submitting bids on rural coverage based on the number of square miles its service will cover. Commissioner Mignon Clyburn called the new system "a framework that will bring reasonably comparable mobile service to those who have been without."

 

While the goal is laudable and the implementation seems workable, the FCC's action does raise a legitimate concern over its likelihood of success.  As FCC Commissioner Michael O'Reilly noted in his endorsement, "While I certainly want to maximize the [benefits], if the requirements are unrealistic, we run the risk that potential bidders will decide not to participate or that providers will have to return funding several years from now."

 

This sort of auction problem would not be new to the FCC.  In the 1990s, when the FCC conducted its spectrum auction for PCS services, it implanted unrealistic guidelines and as a result, more than half the licenses from that auction were later returned for non-payment. This set back U.S. development of mobile broadband for years.

 

The FCC's Connect America Fund vote also involves an incentive auction.  The Commission voted to spend nearly $2 billion in incentives for fixed and wireless rural broadband deployment.

 

But overall, the FCC has taken an important step forward to support rural broadband. Chairman Ajit Pai has made expanded broadband access for all a signature goal of his Chairmanship and this is a tangible step forward.


Mobile Tech: What happens in 2017?

| No Comments
MobileTech_Feb 2017.jpg
What do you think will be going on within the world of mobile tech in 2017?

Looks like things will be real interesting!


"Mobile technology in 2017 will have a heavy concentration on simplicity, speed, and ease of use."



FCC: Brand New Hope

| No Comments


Now that this year's Consumer Electronics Show is over, the tech press gets to engage in its favorite pastime of picking the show's winning products.  There's CNN's "Coolest Tech Products from CES," CNet's "Hottest Products" and Wired's "10 Sharpest Designs."

 

But this focus on neat designs and thin screens misses a bigger and more important issue: the rapidly accelerating use of "fifth generation" mobile broadband technology that underpins these revolutionary products.  Our national transformation to 5G is moving faster than even the most optimistic predictions a year ago. New mobile technology is powering advances from self-driving cars to connected health care.

 

This is important given next week's change in Administrations, particularly the FCC's coming leadership changes. The wireless marketplace is once again proving itself a dynamic and competitive industry that in 2015 alone attracted $32 billion in capital investment.

 

That investment translated into jobs - lots of jobs. According to a 2016 jobs survey, the mobile app economy last year employed 1.66 million Americans - or about the entire population of Philadelphia -- up from about 750,000 in 2013.

 

Hopefully, the magnitude of these numbers gives the new Administration's FCC appointees pause as they look to support the mobile economy. Continued growth in jobs and wireless investment is not preordained. In fact, if the capex numbers from 2016 are any indication, wireless investment actually dropped about 10% compared to 2015.

 

A major reason for this decline is almost certainly the FCC's 2015 decision to regulate mobile broadband like a public utility, a move that deserves an immediate burial, as Republican Commissioners Ajit Pai and Michael Reilly have both urged.

 

But correcting mistakes made by the current FCC is only part of the solution.  The new FCC should focus on helping spur faster deployment of 5G mobile.  That means helping the industry, where possible, with the setting of 5G standards.  It means paying greater attention to reducing impediments to broadband deployment.

 

Most of all, it means becoming more of a partner to the mobile industry instead of trying to dictate to it.  That was the current FCC's key failing - specifically, a lack of appreciation for how technology and consumer demand are changing the mobile industry.

 

In December, the Center for Disease Control released figures showing that 49% of U.S. households are considered "wireless only," and nearly 65% are what the authors call "wireless mostly."

 

Clearly, the mobile revolution in the form of advanced 5G technology is poised to bring benefits across the country.  But this change still needs FCC help. New commissioners and staff should recognize the 5G promise and the benefits to be had from more cooperative policy stances.


LJJ

(TechnicalJones)


Tech World 2016: Ten Game Changers

| No Comments

Image result for technology



The List:

1. Reusable Rockets 

2. Cost-Efficient Solar Panel Production 

3. Power Via Wi-Fi 

4. Cancer Therapies 

5. Tesla's Model 3 

6. Tesla Autopilot  

7. Consumer Virtual Reality 

8. Consumer Augmented Reality 

9. Self-Driving Car Technology 

10. Blockchain For Asset Tracking




mHealth: Technology & Health Behaviors

| No Comments

The Business of Global Healthcare IT

| No Comments

Protecting Tomorrow's Internet

| No Comments


The revolution in mobile healthcare continues to accelerate: More than 40 million smartphone owners now actively use at least one wellness or fitness app and by an overwhelming margin, they report that their health is improving because of it.


So why is the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) undercutting advances vital to this industry's progress?  And how quickly will Congress fix the problem?

 

Those two questions came to mind as I was reading a interesting new analysis of the FCC's recent vote to place the Internet under Title II utility regulations. With almost surgical precision, Internet analyst Larry Downes dissects the Commission's action, showing how the rules could violate multiple areas of federal law.

 

To give one example, the FCC redefined the entire Internet to make it part of the old, antiquated 1930s era telephone system and therefore subject the modern, dynamic Internet to these 1934 regulations.


As a result, Downes notes, every component on the Internet has been transformed into a telephone service and is therefore subject to utility regulation. The FCC, he warns, "can't rewrite the law by giving a key term an absurd new 'definition' [that contradicts] a consistent string of the agency's own precedents, and even basic rules of grammar."

 

The FCC's vote for Title II regulations will harm the Internet and, by extension, our access to new healthcare apps and services.

 

My hope is that Congress will work together to resolve these issues quickly so that needed improvements for both the Internet and telehealth technologies aren't delayed by the resultant legal uncertainties or by what is certain to be federal intrusion as, for the first time, layers of federal bureaucracy are added that impair innovators and their new ideas.


A Congressional action - narrowly focused to ensure Internet openness but without the overreach of Title II - would keep innovation moving.

 

Over the years, mobile and Internet-based healthcare services have emerged as an effective and affordable healthcare solution. As Commissioner Mignon Clyburn stated last fall, "Broadband-enabled solutions, can help communities better manage chronic disease, address language barriers, improve health literacy... and help improve overall population health and wellness."

 

While Commissioner Clyburn is right about the benefits of Internet healthcare, the FCC's decision to regulate the Internet under Title II authority will simply negate the progress made with these innovative services. That is why Congress must find a legislative solution that will combat the FCC's harmful policy and help mHealth programs become more effective.

 

The FCC's decision to regulate the Internet is a recipe for stale and uninspired innvovation. With the wireless Internet in particular, America is among the world's leaders and this has enabled our success in creating services to help seniors, people with chronic & debilitating diseases, and millions more who lack easy access to a doctor.

 

Congress has to both confirm and maintain America's leadership with online healthcare by working together to create and pass a law before the end of this year that extricates the Internet from Title II's overregulation but that permanently ensures an open Internet.


Congress must accept their responsibility to discourage and avoid the unnecessary years of legal wrangling with lawsuits after lawsuits that can be avoided. In the long run it is the consumers that will be the real winnner as innovators can return to what they do best - creating state of the art opportunities for consumers.

 

LJJ

(@TechnicalJones)



Main Index

Recent Posts