Recently in mHealth Category
This summer, The New York Times offered a front-page view of the future of medical care. It was a vision of better health care access, more convenience and the potential for large cost savings. "The same forces that have made instant messaging and video calls part of daily life," said The Times, "Are now shaking up basic medical care."
The rise of online health care access is one of the most important social benefits of the decade. Approximately100,000 mHealth apps are now available to help patients monitor their health and connect with their doctors more easily.
After watching my mother endure years of serious chronic medical conditions and then serving as the primary caregiver of my father, I am especially appreciative that health care providers are increasingly utilizing broadband as an effective way to deliver healthcare services and improve quality of life for their patients.
That's why the recent news about an unexpected plunge in broadband investment is so worrisome. For only the second time since 2003, investment in U.S. Internet services declined in comparison with the previous year. In every other year, broadband investment has moved higher, generating faster Internet service and economic benefits like better health care.
Worse, that other decline, which took place in 2009, could be explained by the Great Recession. But not this one, as our growing economy should, by all rights, mean higher investment.
While many things may have contributed to this bad news, there shouldn't be much doubt on the main culprit: last February's decision by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to begin micromanaging the Internet with Title II regulations from the 1930s.
That FCC action was as unprecedented as it was unnecessary. The constant upgrades fueled by demand for HD video had created an Internet that was unprecedented in its openness.
Unfortunately, this recent news is only the latest sobering development following the FCC's Title II action. Last May, FCC Commissioner Ajit Pai, who opposed the Title II overreach, released a list of several mostly rural communities in the South and West that lost opportunities for better Internet service because of the higher costs and legal uncertainty caused by the FCC's action.
The FCC took the Internet in the wrong direction this year when it voted to treat our sprawling, rapidly evolving service like a public utility. The implications for social benefits are significant - nowhere more than with improved health care.
Loss of investment means less deployment of faster services that are necessary to expanding access to the latest in mHealth. If the FCC won't reverse course, then it's up to Congress to set a better course.
America's adoption of wireless is accelerating and, as a result, so is our ability to help those without access to proper healthcare.
I have lived with the reality of my Mama's chronic illness, and then later took on the job as the primary caregiver of my father at the end of his life. I have experienced what you could and could not do when helping to take care of loved ones who are sick.
Now the technology that could have helped to improve their quality of life is at our fingertips. mHealth has changed medicine, but there is room for even more applications and services. Our country has made a lot of progress in expanding mHealth services - but there certainly is room for even more growth.
That reality also puts an important spotlight on federal wireless policy - specifically the FCC's upcoming spectrum incentive auction and the need for rules that ensure equal access for all participants.
Last week, the federal government released its latest figures on Americans' wireless habits. According to the survey, the number of "wireless only" American homes has risen to more than 45%. More than half of all adults aged 18-44 and children under 18 live in wireless-only households.
But the implications become even more significant by factoring in two additional points. First, almost three in five (59%) adults living under the poverty line are in wireless-only households, compared with 42% of higher income adults. Second, wireless-only substitution seems once again to be accelerating.
Back in 2012-13, the rate of wireless-only household growth fell from 10% to about 7%. But during 2013-14, this growth rate jumped back to more than 10%.
As more people adopt wireless technology, mHealth becomes a more valuable tool with an unmatched ability to reach those most in need of better healthcare - and this ability is growing. The four leading health problems for African-Americans are cancer, strokes, diabetes and heart disease. Each of these can be better diagnosed, treated and monitored with a smartphone and mHealth services.
The surge in mobile reliance and our own self-empowerment to promote our own health should also be a clear signal to federal regulators about next year's wireless spectrum auction. This event's impact will shape our ability to use wireless service for decades. So it's vital that the FCC, which manages the auction, resist calls to micromanage the auction rules by favoring some companies over others. The only results will be costly delays and lawsuits as everyone schemes to game the rules.
All mobile Internet users and consumers of all mobile experiences deserve for their provider to be able to bid on the spectrum needed to bring these health-empowering services to each of us. The FCC should not favor some consumers' companies over others; let us all be able to reach forward and grasp the benefits of today's modern life-enhancing mobile technology.
The expansion of mHealth technology has helped improve health care for many Americans in underserved areas. The upcoming spectrum auction is the next crucial step in ensuring more Americans have access to the health services they need, whether they live in a rural town or a major city.
Much has changed, but more work is needed to make things better.